<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Board Games Aren&#8217;t Dead Yet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brittlefish.com/2005/10/12/board-games-arent-dead-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brittlefish.com/2005/10/12/board-games-arent-dead-yet/</link>
	<description>Games of all sorts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:25:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.brittlefish.com/2005/10/12/board-games-arent-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brittlefish.com/2005/10/12/board-games-arent-dead-yet/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a little hard to say whether they count as &quot;board games&quot;, but interesting non-video-games like Carcasonne and Settles of Catan have consistently held their own when pitted against consoles or computers, in my experience.

I realize neither of these are available to a large company like Hasbro, but I thought they deserved mention. There&#039;s no reason board games inherently can&#039;t compete with video games; it&#039;s just that most board games are frankly less interesting. Technology enables video games to reach a level of complexity that non-computerized can only compete with through elegance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little hard to say whether they count as &#8220;board games&#8221;, but interesting non-video-games like Carcasonne and Settles of Catan have consistently held their own when pitted against consoles or computers, in my experience.</p>
<p>I realize neither of these are available to a large company like Hasbro, but I thought they deserved mention. There&#8217;s no reason board games inherently can&#8217;t compete with video games; it&#8217;s just that most board games are frankly less interesting. Technology enables video games to reach a level of complexity that non-computerized can only compete with through elegance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiny Bison</title>
		<link>http://www.brittlefish.com/2005/10/12/board-games-arent-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiny Bison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brittlefish.com/2005/10/12/board-games-arent-dead-yet/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Board Games From Your Past&lt;/strong&gt;

	Brittlefish has a nice article about the new life Hasbro is trying to breathe into it&#8217;s aging line of board games.  
	You probably played most of these as a child.  Some as an adult. Which ones still hold an attraction for you?
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Board Games From Your Past</strong></p>
<p>	Brittlefish has a nice article about the new life Hasbro is trying to breathe into it&#8217;s aging line of board games.<br />
	You probably played most of these as a child.  Some as an adult. Which ones still hold an attraction for you?<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
